Â鶹´«Ã½

Students are engaged, both individually and collectively, as partners in the enhancement of their educational experience through student representation. The student representation structure aims to ensure that all students are represented.

Partnership with De Montfort Students’ Union (DSU)

The university and the work in partnership to own and manage student representation. DSU Executive Officers are members of various university committees to ensure that the student voice is represented at all levels of university governance.

Student voice and representation in academic quality processes

Student representatives are involved with university and faculty level committees and academic quality processes such as validation and periodic review as full committee or panel members. The DSU website provides useful information about our including how to find your course rep. DSU also have to support course reps with their training needs.

Student Voice Committees (SVCs) and Staff Student Consultative Committees (SSCCs)

The SVCs/SSCCs are an important student voice mechanism. The remit of the SVC/SSCC is to engage students in the enhancement of their educational experience and are designed to give student representatives, normally course reps, the opportunity to convey student views on a range of issues relating to their courses. For example, this may include what is working well, areas for enhancement and discussing any proposed changes with staff. The SVC/SSCC operational guidance, and SVC/SSCC issues log help to ensure meetings are run efficiently and scheduled in line with the relevant PMB.

Students are involved in academic quality processes, both in terms of providing feedback which may be used to inform decisions regarding programmes of study, but also directly through representation as a panel member.

Validation

Students play a key role in programme design and approval. New programme proposals are scrutinised by the relevant Programme Management Board (PMB), which includes student representation. Marketing staff seek students’ views on new programme proposals. A student representative is invited on to the validation panel (where unavailable, a member of the Executive will undertake this role). See validation guidance for student panel members.

Periodic review

Students and alumni are involved in five key ways during the periodic review process. Programme teams reflect on student views whilst writing their Self-Evaluation Document (SED) on which student commentary is also sought. A student representative is invited on to the review panel (where unavailable, a member of the DSU Executive will undertake this role). A group of students also meet with the panel on the day of review. See periodic review guidance for student panel members.

Collaborative provision

Student input is sought throughout all stages of collaborative partner approval and review. A member of the DSU Executive provides comment on the proposed new partners. A student representative is invited on to the validation or review panel (this will normally be member of the DSU Executive team).

Curriculum modification

Students are drivers of change. Feedback through student surveys and staff/student consultation can be one of the triggers for a programme leader to initiate change via the curriculum modification process. Changes can include revised assessments and weightings or learning outcomes. Any curriculum changes require support of the Programme Management Board or equivalent, and the wider faculty, including the Faculty Associate Professor (Quality).

Training for students representatives

Students and staff involved in academic quality assurance and enhancement processes have access to training and support provided by the university and the DSU.

This charter has been created and is maintained jointly by Â鶹´«Ã½ staff and students. It sets out commitments from the university to students, from students to the university, and from the Students’ Union to students.

Starting with a blank sheet of paper, a group of students and staff set out the type of things they thought that they and the university should commit to. From teaching and learning, to support and university life, these ideas were refined into a single document.

That document was then updated and approved by the University Leadership Board, De Montfort Students' Union and the governing body, to create the Â鶹´«Ã½ Student Charter.

The charter will be updated on a yearly basis, and is a guide to your responsibilities at Â鶹´«Ã½, and will help explain what the university should do for you.

If you want to get involved with the development of the student charter, please email us for more information.

A variety of mechanisms are employed to gather student feedback, including questionnaires and surveys. These are conducted both internally within Â鶹´«Ã½, and externally across the higher education sector.

Â鶹´«Ã½ student surveys

Student surveys conducted internally within Â鶹´«Ã½ may include:

• Module or course level surveys during the academic year or when the module or course has finished
• Collaborative partners implement their own procedures for collecting feedback at module level
• surveys and other central support service surveys

External student surveys

Â鶹´«Ã½'s Strategic Planning and Insight team are responsible for managing the university’s involvement in most external surveys including:

• for final year undergraduate students
• Students at collaborative colleges graduating with a foundation degree will be asked to complete the NSS
• (contact the Doctoral College)

Use of survey data

Where students’ views are captured by internal or external surveys, the data is used at the appropriate level within the university to inform improvement. Student feedback informs course improvements through Annual Enhancement Reviews or Collaborative Provision Programme Appraisal & Enhancement Plans (CP-PAE). These are considered by the Programme Management Board (PMB) and Faculty Academic Committee (FAC) with action plans devised as appropriate. Institutional level survey outcomes are used to inform debate and action at university committees.

General guidance

Student Charter: Sets out commitments from the university to students, from students to the university, and from the De Montfort Students’ Union (DSU) to students.

Student representation

Student Voice Committee (SVC)/Staff Student Consultative Committee (SSVC) operational guidance: Provides operational guidance on the remit of SVCs/SSCCs, their delivery and constitution.

SVC/SSCC issues log: The issues log can replace or be used in conjunction with SVC/SSCC meeting notes, for both SVCs/SSCCs which meet physically or electronically (e-SVCs/e-SSCCs).

Student participation in academic quality

Validation guidance for student panel members: Provides guidance for all student panel members on their roles and responsibilities in validation, outlining the aims, purpose and process of validation.

Periodic review guidance for student panel members: Provides guidance for all student panel members on their roles and responsibilities in periodic review, outlining the aims, purpose and process of review.